Paul Erasmus

614 total citations
10 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Paul Erasmus is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Erasmus has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 5 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Paul Erasmus's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Paul Erasmus is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Paul Erasmus collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. Paul Erasmus's co-authors include J. Robert Sneyd, Gary Minto, K B Hosie, Neil Mellor, A. Collingwood, Matthew Cramp, Matthew Bowles, U. Warshow, Somaiah Aroori and Tim Cross and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Liver Transplantation and Anaesthesia.

In The Last Decade

Paul Erasmus

10 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul Erasmus United Kingdom 6 338 318 70 47 42 10 410
P. L. McNicol Australia 10 141 0.4× 112 0.4× 55 0.8× 60 1.3× 59 1.4× 17 303
Stephan Czerner Germany 10 289 0.9× 115 0.4× 148 2.1× 20 0.4× 13 0.3× 25 424
Kar-Lai Wong United States 3 281 0.8× 718 2.3× 63 0.9× 6 0.1× 12 0.3× 6 863
Pierre Sagnard France 11 323 1.0× 98 0.3× 195 2.8× 27 0.6× 77 1.8× 23 421
Maryse Palardy United States 15 177 0.5× 282 0.9× 43 0.6× 8 0.2× 16 0.4× 27 406
M Grounds United Kingdom 6 340 1.0× 294 0.9× 43 0.6× 79 1.7× 22 0.5× 17 443
W. G. Parkin Australia 10 208 0.6× 119 0.4× 39 0.6× 33 0.7× 46 1.1× 16 289
Franco Bortone Italy 10 135 0.4× 201 0.6× 85 1.2× 45 1.0× 5 0.1× 15 342
Marián Fedorco Czechia 9 53 0.2× 270 0.8× 48 0.7× 13 0.3× 10 0.2× 26 344
Nicole van Hout Germany 8 245 0.7× 178 0.6× 27 0.4× 51 1.1× 38 0.9× 10 309

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Erasmus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Erasmus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Erasmus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Erasmus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Erasmus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Erasmus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Erasmus. The network helps show where Paul Erasmus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Erasmus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Erasmus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Erasmus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Erasmus. Paul Erasmus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Erasmus, Paul, et al.. (2025). Comparing Digital Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Systemic Psychotherapy Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 14. e46441–e46441. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bowles, Matthew, et al.. (2015). Clinical assessment before hepatectomy identifies high-risk patients. Journal of Surgical Research. 198(1). 87–92. 4 indexed citations
3.
Creanor, Siobhan, Paul Erasmus, Neil Mellor, et al.. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of stroke volume optimization during elective major abdominal surgery in patients stratified by aerobic fitness. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 115(4). 578–589. 29 indexed citations
4.
Erasmus, Paul, et al.. (2014). Impaired functional capacity in potential liver transplant candidates predicts short-term mortality before transplantation. Liver Transplantation. 20(9). 1081–1088. 32 indexed citations
5.
Shahtahmassebi, Golnaz, Tom Woolley, Paul Erasmus, et al.. (2013). Serum arterial lactate concentration predicts mortality and organ dysfunction following liver resection. Perioperative Medicine. 2(1). 21–21. 34 indexed citations
6.
Sneyd, J. Robert, et al.. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 108(1). 53–62. 188 indexed citations
7.
Sneyd, J. Robert, et al.. (2009). Interobserver variability in determination of anaerobic threshold by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Anaesthesia. 65(1). 109–110. 1 indexed citations
8.
Erasmus, Paul, et al.. (2008). Assessing fitness for surgery: a comparison of questionnaire, incremental shuttle walk, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in general surgical patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 101(6). 774–780. 106 indexed citations
9.
Erasmus, Paul. (2007). Evidence‐Based Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Anaesthesia. 62(4). 429–430. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026