Paul Diesing
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Glenn H. SnyderDiana CraneRichard G. HeadAlan S. AlexandroffArnold BerleantTalcott ParsonsKenneth KofordPaul Piccone
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers)Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Political Science ReviewForeign Affairs
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul Diesing
22 papers receiving 809 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 477
- Political Science and International Relations 405
- Economics and Econometrics 164
- Strategy and Management 110
- Management Science and Operations Research 109
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Diesing
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Diesing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Diesing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Diesing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Diesing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Diesing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Diesing. The network helps show where Paul Diesing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Diesing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Diesing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Diesing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Diesing. Paul Diesing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Science and Ideology in the Policy Sciences | 23 |
| 9 | 86 | |
| 10 | 342 | |
| 11 | 232 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 125 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Paul Diesing
Paul Diesing is a scholar working on Public Administration, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (67 citations), Political Science and International Relations (405 citations) and Public Administration (44 citations). Paul Diesing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Glenn H. Snyder, Diana Crane, Richard G. Head, Alan S. Alexandroff, Arnold Berleant, Talcott Parsons, Kenneth Koford and Paul Piccone. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Political Science Review and Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.