Paul de Vreede
About
In The Last Decade
Paul de Vreede
3 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Physiology 156
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 125
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 124
- Psychiatry and Mental health 116
- General Health Professions 46
Countries citing papers authored by Paul de Vreede
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul de Vreede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul de Vreede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul de Vreede more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul de Vreede
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul de Vreede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul de Vreede. The network helps show where Paul de Vreede may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul de Vreede
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul de Vreede. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul de Vreede based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul de Vreede. Paul de Vreede is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 83 | |
| 2 | 280 | |
| 3 | 59 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.