Paul Celano

5.6k citations
24 papers · 1.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Paul Celano

24 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials6471983202619972011200400600

Peers

Paul Celano
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 208
  • Chemical Health and Safety 7
  • Statistics and Probability 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 173
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 233
Replace Jinhui Tian with:
Jinhui Tian China
Doozie Russell United States
Rhona Beynon United Kingdom
Haris Riaz United States
Oscar Bortolami Italy
Jane Porter United States
Margaret L. Gourlay United States
Hongwei Zhao China
Élodie Perrodeau France
Anne Eisinga United Kingdom
Paul Celano relative to Jinhui Tian China Jinhui Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Jinhui Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Celano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Celano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Celano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Celano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Celano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Celano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Celano. The network helps show where Paul Celano may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Celano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Celano Line = papers co-authored together Paul Celano links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202314
2 202314
3 202217
4 20193
5 201814
6 201841
7 201723
8 20178
9 201342
10 201266
11 201112
12 200811
13 20052
14 1991156
15
Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trialsbreakdown →
1983647
16 19812
17 198028
18 197725
19 19771
20 197735

About Paul Celano

Paul Celano is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Occupational Therapy, Reproductive Medicine, Statistics and Probability and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4 papers), Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Digestive system and related health (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers) and Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (208 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (7 citations), Statistics and Probability (84 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (173 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (233 citations). Paul Celano has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Henry S. Sacks, Harry Smith, Thomas C. Chalmers, O. Koldovský, Stanley R. Hamilton, Susan V. Booker, G. Johan A. Offerhaus, Francis M. Giardiello, Anne J. Krush and John T. Boyle. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Oncology Practice, Gastroenterology and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026