Paul Cabilio

474 citations
32 papers · 276 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Cabilio

32 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Paul Cabilio
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Statistics and Probability 137
  • Management Science and Operations Research 59
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 26
  • Finance 31
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 26
Replace Andréa V. Rocha with:
Andréa V. Rocha Brazil
W. Klonecki Poland
Felipe Osorio Chile
Marta Pérez‐Casany Spain
Hans Nyquist Sweden
R. McVinish Australia
Georgi N. Boshnakov United Kingdom
Tetsuya Kaji United States
Patrícia L. Espinheira Brazil
Michel Gendron Canada
Paul Cabilio relative to Andréa V. Rocha Brazil Andréa V. Rocha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andréa V. Rocha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Cabilio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Cabilio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Cabilio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Cabilio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Cabilio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Cabilio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Cabilio. The network helps show where Paul Cabilio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Paul Cabilio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Cabilio Line = papers co-authored together Paul Cabilio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199656
2 198222
3 199521
4 198421
5 199517
6 199116
7 199615
8 197712
9 198711
10 197510
11 19699
12 19948
13 20107
14 19846
15 20125
16 20085
17 19954
18 19953
19 19823
20 19813

About Paul Cabilio

Paul Cabilio is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Finance and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 32 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (12 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (9 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (7 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (4 papers) and Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (137 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (59 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (26 citations), Finance (31 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (26 citations). Paul Cabilio has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Mayer Alvo, S. P. Vander Kloet, Paul D. Feigin, Herbert Robbins, Frits Agterberg, Graham R. Daborn, Ying Zhang, Paul J. Farrell, Ying Zhang and Femida Gwadry‐Sridhar. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Statistics, Environmetrics, The Annals of Statistics, Journal of the American Statistical Association and The American Statistician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact