Paul C. LoCasto

437 total citations
9 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Paul C. LoCasto is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul C. LoCasto has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Paul C. LoCasto's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers). Paul C. LoCasto is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (3 papers). Paul C. LoCasto collaborates with scholars based in United States. Paul C. LoCasto's co-authors include Cynthia M. Connine, Martha W. Burton, Rao P. Gullapalli, David J. Patterson and David J. Burn and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Paul C. LoCasto

7 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Paul C. LoCasto United States	6	177	160	102	72	51	9	288
Philip J. Monahan Canada	11	266 1.5×	206 1.3×	128 1.3×	41 0.6×	34 0.7×	26	372
John M. Tomlinson United States	7	96 0.5×	98 0.6×	59 0.6×	23 0.3×	51 1.0×	12	232
Dicky Gilbers Netherlands	10	106 0.6×	141 0.9×	86 0.8×	62 0.9×	54 1.1×	34	292
Mária Gósy Hungary	8	72 0.4×	141 0.9×	51 0.5×	37 0.5×	71 1.4×	44	227
Susan J. Behrens United States	10	235 1.3×	251 1.6×	105 1.0×	73 1.0×	71 1.4×	23	408
Meredith M. Hughes United States	4	141 0.8×	102 0.6×	140 1.4×	17 0.2×	16 0.3×	5	277
Anne Lacheret France	10	150 0.8×	198 1.2×	33 0.3×	55 0.8×	137 2.7×	36	378
Daniel McCloy United States	8	152 0.9×	103 0.6×	43 0.4×	50 0.7×	59 1.2×	23	288
Evelyn P. Altenberg United States	9	102 0.6×	204 1.3×	149 1.5×	100 1.4×	90 1.8×	15	344
Kyriakos Antoniou United Kingdom	10	179 1.0×	114 0.7×	167 1.6×	35 0.5×	26 0.5×	14	314

Countries citing papers authored by Paul C. LoCasto

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul C. LoCasto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul C. LoCasto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul C. LoCasto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul C. LoCasto

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul C. LoCasto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul C. LoCasto. The network helps show where Paul C. LoCasto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul C. LoCasto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul C. LoCasto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul C. LoCasto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul C. LoCasto. Paul C. LoCasto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

LoCasto, Paul C., et al.. (2022). Superman Takes a Taxi: Testing Theories of Validation with Inconsistencies in Fantastic Narratives. Discourse Processes. 59(3). 137–158.

2.

LoCasto, Paul C., et al.. (2016). Would a madman have been so wise as this?” The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition. 45(2). 281–295. 15 indexed citations

3.

LoCasto, Paul C. & Cynthia M. Connine. (2011). Processing of No-release Variants in Connected Speech. Language and Speech. 54(2). 181–197. 4 indexed citations

4.

LoCasto, Paul C., Cynthia M. Connine, & David J. Patterson. (2007). The Role of Additional Processing Time and Lexical Constraint in Spoken Word Recognition. Language and Speech. 50(1). 53–75. 5 indexed citations

5.

Burton, Martha W., et al.. (2005). A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing. NeuroImage. 26(3). 647–661. 113 indexed citations

6.

LoCasto, Paul C., et al.. (2004). An fMRI Investigation of Speech and Tone Segmentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 16(9). 1612–1624. 44 indexed citations

7.

Patterson, David J., Paul C. LoCasto, & Cynthia M. Connine. (2003). Corpora Analyses of Frequency of Schwa Deletion in Conversational American English. Phonetica. 60(1). 45–69. 62 indexed citations

8.

LoCasto, Paul C. & Cynthia M. Connine. (2002). Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics. 64(2). 208–219. 44 indexed citations

9.

Connine, Cynthia M. & Paul C. LoCasto. (2000). Inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23(3). 328–328. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact