This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bachner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bachner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bachner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bachner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bachner. The network helps show where Paul Bachner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Bachner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Bachner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Bachner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Bachner. Paul Bachner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rj, Zarbo, et al.. (1996). Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations. College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study.. PubMed. 120(1). 19–25.23 indexed citations
4.
Schifman, Ron B., Paul Bachner, & Peter J. Howanitz. (1996). Blood culture quality improvement: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 909 institutions and 289 572 blood culture sets.. PubMed. 120(11). 999–1002.35 indexed citations
5.
Herron, R. E., et al.. (1995). Transfusion medicine monitoring practices. A study of the College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group.. PubMed. 119(11). 999–1006.28 indexed citations
6.
Hajdu, Steven I., Jonathan I. Epstein, Robert W. Prichard, & Paul Bachner. (1995). Malpractice vs. Benepractice. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 19(4). 481–481.1 indexed citations
Jones, Bruce A., Paul Bachner, & Peter J. Howanitz. (1993). Bedside glucose monitoring. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of the program characteristics and performance in 605 institutions.. PubMed. 117(11). 1080–7.13 indexed citations
Renner, Stephen W., Peter J. Howanitz, & Paul Bachner. (1993). Wristband identification error reporting in 712 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes study of quality issues in transfusion practice.. PubMed. 117(6). 573–7.86 indexed citations
12.
Bachner, Paul. (1992). Quality improvement in the modern clinical laboratory: the regulatory and accreditation perspective.. PubMed. 10(1). 27–35.1 indexed citations
13.
Howanitz, Peter J., Kyle Walker, & Paul Bachner. (1992). Quantification of errors in laboratory reports. A quality improvement study of the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes program.. PubMed. 116(7). 694–700.17 indexed citations
Zarbo, Richard J., Peter J. Howanitz, & Paul Bachner. (1991). Interinstitutional comparison of performance in breast fine-needle aspiration cytology. A Q-probe quality indicator study.. PubMed. 115(8). 743–50.54 indexed citations
16.
Bachner, Paul, et al.. (1991). Q-probes: a tool for enhancing your lab's QA.. PubMed. 23(11). 37–8, 40, 42 passim.2 indexed citations
17.
Bachner, Paul. (1990). The epidemiology of fear. Scientific, social, and political responses to the occupational risk of blood-borne infection.. PubMed. 114(3). 319–23.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.