Pascal Weil

1.8k citations
55 papers · 646 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Pascal Weil

54 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Pascal Weil
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 607
  • Geometry and Topology 166
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 45
  • Artificial Intelligence 338
  • Mathematical Physics 49
Replace Denis Thérien with:
Denis Thérien Canada
Jean-Éric Pin France
Jacques Sakarovitch France
Stuart Margolis United States
Dietrich Kuske Germany
Mikhail V. Volkov Russia
Jorge Almeida Portugal
Stefano Varricchio Italy
John Meakin United States
Friedrich Otto Germany
Pascal Weil relative to Denis Thérien Canada Denis Thérien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Denis Thérien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pascal Weil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pascal Weil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pascal Weil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pascal Weil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pascal Weil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pascal Weil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pascal Weil. The network helps show where Pascal Weil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pascal Weil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pascal Weil Line = papers co-authored together Pascal Weil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199772
2 200136
3 199834
4 200034
5 199633
6 199228
7 199623
8 199323
9 198920
10 200220
11 200218
12 200117
13 200016
14 199716
15 199416
16 200715
17 199215
18 199214
19 198913
20 198913

About Pascal Weil

Pascal Weil is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (48 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (28 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (19 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (4 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (607 citations), Geometry and Topology (166 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (45 citations), Artificial Intelligence (338 citations) and Mathematical Physics (49 citations). Pascal Weil has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jean-Éric Pin, Jorge Almeida, Kamal Lodaya, Samuel Margolis, John Rhodes, Mark Sapir, John Meakin, Howard Straubing, Bruno Courcelle and Peter Trotter. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Algebra and Computation, Theoretical Computer Science, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Semigroup Forum and Journal of Group Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact