Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pardeep Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pardeep Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pardeep Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pardeep Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pardeep Kumar. The network helps show where Pardeep Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pardeep Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pardeep Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pardeep Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pardeep Kumar. Pardeep Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Singh, V. K., et al.. (2019). Impact of front line demonstration in adoption extent and horizontal spread of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivation in Tarai region of Siddharthnagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(3). 4024–4028.1 indexed citations
11.
Kumar, Pardeep, et al.. (2017). Clonal propagation of Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. ex Wendl. through adventitious rhizogenesis in mini cuttings.. 16(4). 161–168.1 indexed citations
12.
Kumar, Pardeep, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of production performance of some economic traits in White Leghorn birds.. Haryana Veterinarian. 54(1). 19–21.3 indexed citations
13.
Singh, Anshuman, R. K. Singh, Pardeep Kumar, & Ashutosh Singh. (2015). Mango biodiversity in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: Indigenous knowledge and traditional products. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 14(2). 258–264.6 indexed citations
Duhan, Joginder Singh, et al.. (2014). FREE RADICAL SCAVENGING AND ANTIMICROBIAL POTENTIAL OF MIXTURE OF SELECTIVE MEDICINAL PLANTS. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 7(4). 27–32.12 indexed citations
Singh, D. K., Pardeep Kumar, Neelam Mishra, S. K. Singh, & Abhishek Singh. (2012). Effect of cobalt, boron and molybdenum at different fertility status on organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil after crop harvest of pea (Pisum sativum L.).. 23(1). 27–30.3 indexed citations
18.
Singh, D. K., Pardeep Kumar, Neelam Mishra, S. K. Singh, & Abhishek Singh. (2011). Interactive effect of cobalt, boron and molybdenum at different fertility status on available nitrogen and organic nitrogen in soil after pea (Pisum sativum L.) crop harvest.. 22(1). 57–61.2 indexed citations
19.
Choudhary, Naveen, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of red and yellow capsicum hybrids for quality attributes in naturally ventilated polyhouse in mid hills of western himalayas. Vegetable Science. 38(2). 218–220.3 indexed citations
20.
Kumar, Pardeep, et al.. (2010). Role of Ayucal Liquid in improving overall performance and tibial mineralisation in broilers.. Veterinary World. 3(9). 424–426.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.