Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Pardeep Khanna
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Pardeep Khanna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pardeep Khanna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pardeep Khanna more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pardeep Khanna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pardeep Khanna. The network helps show where Pardeep Khanna may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pardeep Khanna
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pardeep Khanna.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pardeep Khanna based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pardeep Khanna. Pardeep Khanna is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chawla, Suraj, Ramesh Verma, & Pardeep Khanna. (2016). Practices Regarding Biomedical Waste Management among Health Functionaries: A Rural Haryana Perspective -. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(4). 252–256.4 indexed citations
Verma, Ramesh, Pardeep Khanna, & Suraj Chawla. (2014). Adult immunization in India. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 11(9). e29342–e29342.13 indexed citations
5.
Khanna, Pardeep, et al.. (2013). Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program in India: The Need to Strengthen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.17 indexed citations
6.
Verma, Ramesh & Pardeep Khanna. (2013). National Program of Health-Care for the Elderly in India: A Hope for Healthy Ageing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.24 indexed citations
7.
Khanna, Pardeep, et al.. (2013). EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTATION OF WHEAT BRAN ON THE PRODUCTION OF SHIITAKE (LENTINUS EDODES (BERK) PEGLAR) USING WHEAT STRAW AND SAW DUST SUBSTRATES. 8(3). 817–820.5 indexed citations
Khanna, Pardeep, et al.. (2012). Influenza vaccine. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 8(5). 675–678.9 indexed citations
13.
Bairwa, Mohan, et al.. (2012). Malaria vaccine. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 8(6). 819–822.4 indexed citations
14.
Verma, Ramesh, Meena Meena, Pardeep Khanna, et al.. (2011). Prevalence of tobacco use & its correlate factors among school going adolescents in rural areas of Haryana, India. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2(2). 142–146.
Arora, Varun, et al.. (2010). Prevalence of diabetes in urban Haryana.. Australasian Medical Journal. 3(8). 488–494.21 indexed citations
19.
Kapoor, Shammi, et al.. (2009). Effect of Supplementation of Wheat Straw on Growth and Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Potential of Lentinus edodes. World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science. 5(3). 328–331.13 indexed citations
20.
Khanna, Pardeep, et al.. (1996). Nutritional evaluation of Pleurotus florida. 5(2).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.