Pankaj Agarwal

77 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Pankaj Agarwal
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 853
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 118
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Pharmacology 148
  • Microbiology 12
Replace Yanjun Li with:
Yanjun Li China
Michael Elkin Israel
Ling‐Yun Wu China
Gunnar W. Klau Germany
Reinhard Laubenbacher United States
Lorenz Wernisch United Kingdom
Xiuzhen Huang United States
David Salomon United States
Guohui Lin Canada
Pankaj Agarwal relative to Yanjun Li China Yanjun Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Yanjun Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pankaj Agarwal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pankaj Agarwal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pankaj Agarwal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pankaj Agarwal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pankaj Agarwal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pankaj Agarwal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pankaj Agarwal. The network helps show where Pankaj Agarwal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pankaj Agarwal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pankaj Agarwal Line = papers co-authored together Pankaj Agarwal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20197
4 201813
5 201712
6
Prediction of Secondary Structure of Protein Using Support Vector Machine
20140
7 20139
8 20137
9 20131
10 20123
11 201211
12 201134
13 2011190
14 200980
15 200812
16 20028
17
I/O-Efficient Algorithms for Contour-line Extraction and Planar Graph Blocking (Extended Abstract).
19981
18
Proceedings of the third workshop on the algorithmic foundations of robotics on Robotics : the algorithmic perspective: the algorithmic perspective
19981
19 199616
20 197016

About Pankaj Agarwal

Pankaj Agarwal is a scholar working on Microbiology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Business and International Management, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (19 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (17 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (12 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (8 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (853 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (118 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Pharmacology (148 citations) and Microbiology (12 citations). Pankaj Agarwal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Lun Yang, Guanghui Hu, Dilip Rajagopalan, Yong Li, Mark R. Hurle, David B. Searls, Philippe Sanséau, Josep F. Abril, Roderic Guigó and David J. States. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, PLoS ONE, Bioinformatics, Drug Discovery Today and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026