Pamela Gray-Toft

8 total papers · 1.2k total citations
7 papers, 981 citations indexed

About

Pamela Gray-Toft is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pamela Gray-Toft has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 981 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Research and Theory and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Pamela Gray-Toft's work include Nursing education and management (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers). Pamela Gray-Toft is often cited by papers focused on Nursing education and management (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers). Pamela Gray-Toft collaborates with scholars based in United States. Pamela Gray-Toft's co-authors include James G. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Pamela Gray-Toft

7 papers receiving 857 citations

Hit Papers

The Nursing Stress Scale:... 1981 2026 1996 2011 1981 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Pamela Gray-Toft 747 329 178 137 125 7 981
Doris C. Vahey 632 0.8× 206 0.6× 79 0.4× 126 0.9× 181 1.4× 8 811
Natasha Khamisa 824 1.1× 417 1.3× 231 1.3× 202 1.5× 83 0.7× 15 1.2k
Lucía Ramírez‐Baena 680 0.9× 437 1.3× 285 1.6× 84 0.6× 93 0.7× 19 983
Danny Van heusden 668 0.9× 164 0.5× 76 0.4× 171 1.2× 241 1.9× 10 863
Maria Reinius 676 0.9× 322 1.0× 170 1.0× 72 0.5× 75 0.6× 18 1.1k
Patrick A. Tyler 570 0.8× 296 0.9× 224 1.3× 120 0.9× 58 0.5× 15 856
Denise Albieri Jodas Salvagioni 700 0.9× 322 1.0× 313 1.8× 123 0.9× 38 0.3× 12 1.0k
Anastasia Tsipa 843 1.1× 365 1.1× 139 0.8× 54 0.4× 58 0.5× 10 1.2k
Anne Fothergill 702 0.9× 305 0.9× 299 1.7× 76 0.6× 69 0.6× 29 967
Elena Ortega‐Campos 865 1.2× 548 1.7× 289 1.6× 72 0.5× 129 1.0× 31 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Gray-Toft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Gray-Toft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Gray-Toft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Gray-Toft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Gray-Toft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Gray-Toft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Gray-Toft. The network helps show where Pamela Gray-Toft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Gray-Toft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Gray-Toft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Gray-Toft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Gray-Toft. Pamela Gray-Toft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026