Pamela G. Watson
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Robert DingwallElizabeth MurphyDavid GreatbatchSusan W. ParkerNancy WellsMargaret NelsonK. ShanmugaratnamJeff Jones
- Topics
- Stoma care and complications (4 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers)Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical PathologyBritish Journal of OphthalmologyThe Medical Journal of Australia
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
Pamela G. Watson
35 papers receiving 527 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- General Health Professions 217
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 118
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- Clinical Psychology 65
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela G. Watson
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela G. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela G. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela G. Watson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela G. Watson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela G. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela G. Watson. The network helps show where Pamela G. Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela G. Watson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela G. Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela G. Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela G. Watson. Pamela G. Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. | 280 |
| 6 | Assessing services. Knowing the score. | 1 |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Pamela G. Watson
Pamela G. Watson is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Leadership and Management, having authored 39 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stoma care and complications (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (13 citations), General Health Professions (217 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations). Pamela G. Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Robert Dingwall, Elizabeth Murphy, David Greatbatch, Susan W. Parker, Nancy Wells, Margaret Nelson, K. Shanmugaratnam, Jeff Jones, Diane Adler and Stephen Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Pathology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.