Pamela Cochran
About
In The Last Decade
Pamela Cochran
6 papers receiving 638 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Molecular Biology 330
- Ecology 157
- Immunology 128
- Plant Science 100
- Virology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Cochran
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Cochran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Cochran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Cochran more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Cochran
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Cochran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Cochran. The network helps show where Pamela Cochran may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Cochran
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Cochran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Cochran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Cochran. Pamela Cochran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 346 | |
| 2 | 124 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | Lysogeny and transduction in the marine environment | 2 |
| 5 | 107 | |
| 6 | 79 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.