Pam Firth

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 869 citations indexed

About

Pam Firth is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Pam Firth has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 869 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Pam Firth's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Pam Firth is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Pam Firth collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Pam Firth's co-authors include Lukas Radbruch, Saskia Jünger, Dianne Gove, Jenny T. van der Steen, Philip Larkin, Anneke L. Francke, Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans, Ladislav Volicer, Cees M.P.M. Hertogh and Julian C. Hughes and has published in prestigious journals such as Theriogenology, Palliative Medicine and International Psychogeriatrics.

In The Last Decade

Pam Firth

14 papers receiving 822 citations

Hit Papers

White paper defining optimal palliative care in older peo... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 200 400 600

Peers

Pam Firth
James Womer United States
Elizabeth A. Luth United States
Sonja J. Meiers United States
Gary Loving United States
Phyllis Whitehead United States
Jenny Tohotoa Australia
Azza H. Ahmed United States
Iraida V. Carrion United States
Pam Firth
Citations per year, relative to Pam Firth Pam Firth (= 1×) peers Rafael Montoya‐Juárez

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Firth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Firth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Firth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Firth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Firth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Firth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Firth. The network helps show where Pam Firth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Firth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Firth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Firth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Firth. Pam Firth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Otis‐Green, Shirley, et al.. (2021). International Collaboration in the Time of COVID-19: The World Hospice and Palliative Care Social Work Network. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care. 17(2-3). 137–145. 7 indexed citations
2.
Firth, Pam, et al.. (2020). Social work in hospice and palliative care in Europe: Findings from an EAPC survey. Palliative & Supportive Care. 18(6). 662–669. 13 indexed citations
3.
Steen, Jenny T. van der, Lukas Radbruch, Marike E. de Boer, et al.. (2015). Achieving consensus and controversy around applicability of palliative care to dementia. International Psychogeriatrics. 28(1). 133–145. 30 indexed citations
4.
Kasimanickam, R., Pam Firth, G.M. Schuenemann, et al.. (2014). Effect of the first GnRH and two doses of PGF2α in a 5-day progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on heifer pregnancy. Theriogenology. 81(6). 797–804. 31 indexed citations
5.
Hughes, Sean, et al.. (2014). Core competencies for palliative care social work in Europe: an EAPC White Paper -part 1. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 6 indexed citations
6.
Steen, Jenny T. van der, Lukas Radbruch, Cees M.P.M. Hertogh, et al.. (2013). White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliative Medicine. 28(3). 197–209. 659 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Firth, Pam. (2011). Book reviews. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 17(9). 461–461. 4 indexed citations
9.
Radbruch, Lukas, Sheila Payne, Daniel Büche, et al.. (2011). Standards und Richtlinien für Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung in Europa: Teil 1 1 Weißbuch zu Empfehlungen der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Palliative Care (EAPC) White Paper on Standards and Norms for Hospice and Palliative Care in Europe: Part 1 Recommendations of the European Association for Palliative Care. 44 indexed citations
10.
Payne, Sheila, Peter Hudson, Gunn Grande, et al.. (2010). White Paper on Improving Support for Family Carers in Palliative Care, Part 1.. 17(6). 286–290. 14 indexed citations
11.
Firth, Pam, et al.. (2010). The art and science of social work. Progress in Palliative Care. 18(4). 203–204. 4 indexed citations
12.
Firth, Pam. (2006). Patients and Their Families. PubMed. 168. 61–71. 12 indexed citations
13.
Firth, Pam, et al.. (2004). Loss, Change and Bereavement in Palliative Care. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 16 indexed citations
14.
Firth, Pam. (1969). Inhibition of lactation.. BMJ. 1(5638). 254.3–255. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026