Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Poverty trends in South Africa : an examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2011
2014282 citationsPali LehohlaMedical Entomology and Zoologyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Pali Lehohla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pali Lehohla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pali Lehohla more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pali Lehohla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pali Lehohla. The network helps show where Pali Lehohla may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pali Lehohla
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pali Lehohla.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pali Lehohla based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pali Lehohla. Pali Lehohla is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
1998·Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe·F. Mark Orkin,
Pali Lehohla,
(unknown)
8
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.