Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Neurobiology of neocortex
1989450 citationsP. VoorhoeveJournal of the Neurological Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Voorhoeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Voorhoeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Voorhoeve more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Voorhoeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Voorhoeve. The network helps show where P. Voorhoeve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Voorhoeve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Voorhoeve.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Voorhoeve based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Voorhoeve. P. Voorhoeve is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1989). Neurobiology of neocortex. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 89(1). 115–115.450 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1984). Kutaha, ketah of misschien kutah?. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 140(2). 333–334.1 indexed citations
Voorhoeve, P.. (1970). Kerintji documents. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 126(4). 369–399.2 indexed citations
11.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1969). De grote Hikajat Bachtiar. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 125(3). 374–375.
12.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1966). In memoriam Sir Richard Winstedt, 2-8-1878—2-6-1966. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 122(4). 413–415.1 indexed citations
Voorhoeve, P.. (1961). Supplement op de lijst der geschriften van Raniri. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 117(4). 481–482.1 indexed citations
16.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1959). Nuruddin ar-Raniri. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 115(1). 90–91.1 indexed citations
17.
Drewes, G. W. J., et al.. (1952). Book Reviews. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 108(1). 75–91.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1952). Three old Achehnese Manuscripts. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 14(2). 335–345.4 indexed citations
20.
Voorhoeve, P.. (1951). Van en over Nuruddin ar-Raniri. Bijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 107(4). 353–368.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.