P. Stamer

2.8k total citations
26 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

P. Stamer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Stamer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in P. Stamer's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (22 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (13 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers). P. Stamer is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (22 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (13 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers). P. Stamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Israel. P. Stamer's co-authors include E. L. Koller, S. Taylor, R. J. Plano, P. Jacques, E. B. Brucker, D. Pandoulas, C. Baltay, M. Kalelkar, R. Hylton and H. French and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

P. Stamer

24 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
P. Stamer United States 9 125 38 8 8 6 26 148
E. L. Koller United States 10 147 1.2× 43 1.1× 9 1.1× 10 1.3× 7 1.2× 26 166
R.W. Kraemer United States 4 96 0.8× 38 1.0× 5 0.6× 8 1.0× 6 1.0× 5 128
R. R. Larsen United States 5 127 1.0× 33 0.9× 8 1.0× 11 1.4× 8 1.3× 10 149
L. Paoluzi Italy 8 143 1.1× 22 0.6× 7 0.9× 13 1.6× 18 3.0× 20 156
L. Camilleri United States 6 111 0.9× 25 0.7× 15 1.9× 9 1.1× 3 0.5× 8 124
G. Szklarz France 10 235 1.9× 20 0.5× 6 0.8× 6 0.8× 8 1.3× 14 243
H. Reithler Germany 4 117 0.9× 16 0.4× 3 0.4× 11 1.4× 5 0.8× 5 126
R. D. Schamberger United States 7 164 1.3× 17 0.4× 3 0.4× 7 0.9× 9 1.5× 17 171
M. Fukawa Japan 10 177 1.4× 20 0.5× 2 0.3× 7 0.9× 9 1.5× 18 186
P. Gregory United Kingdom 9 154 1.2× 16 0.4× 7 0.9× 3 0.4× 3 0.5× 20 187

Countries citing papers authored by P. Stamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Stamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Stamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Stamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Stamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Stamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Stamer. The network helps show where P. Stamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Stamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Stamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Stamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Stamer. P. Stamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boca, G., G. Corti, Gabriele Gianini, et al.. (1992). A fractal analysis of multiparticle production in hadron-hadron collisions at $$\sqrt s $$ =16.7 GeV.. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 105(6). 865–878. 1 indexed citations
2.
Baker, N. J., S. Kahn, M. J. Murtagh, et al.. (1991). μ−e+dilepton production in charged-currentνμinteractions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 43(9). 2765–2777. 2 indexed citations
3.
Baltay, C., M. Bregman, M. Hibbs, et al.. (1985). Limits on Like-Sign Dilepton Production inνμInteractions. Physical Review Letters. 55(23). 2543–2546. 3 indexed citations
4.
Brucker, E. B., P. Jacques, M. Kalelkar, et al.. (1985). Intranuclear cascade inνμNe interactions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 32(7). 1605–1608. 3 indexed citations
5.
Jacques, P., M. Kalelkar, R. J. Plano, et al.. (1981). Cross-section ratioσ(νn)σ(νp)for charged-current and neutral-current interactions below 10 GeV. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 24(5). 1067–1070. 2 indexed citations
6.
Baltay, C., H. French, M. Hibbs, et al.. (1980). Cross Sections and Scaling-Variable Distributions of Neutral- and Charged- Current Neutrino-Nucleon Interactions from a Low-Energy Narrow Band Beam. Physical Review Letters. 44(14). 916–919. 14 indexed citations
7.
Jacques, P., M. Kalelkar, R. J. Plano, et al.. (1980). Search for prompt neutrinos and penetrating neutral particles in a beam-dump experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 21(5). 1206–1208. 14 indexed citations
8.
Jacques, P., et al.. (1977). On-line display aids for the automated measuring of bubble chamber film at Fermilab energies. Review of Scientific Instruments. 48(8). 963–966. 1 indexed citations
9.
Fridman, A., J. Gerber, P. Juillot, et al.. (1975). Study of charged multiplicity distributions inp¯ninteractions at 5.55, 9.3, and 14.6 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 12(11). 3414–3423. 3 indexed citations
10.
Brucker, E. B., E. L. Koller, S. Taylor, et al.. (1974). Study of the reactionp¯n→p¯pπat 14.6 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 10(5). 1373–1378.
11.
Brick, D., A. Fridman, J. Gerber, et al.. (1974). The $$\bar p$$ dπ+π− final state coherently produced by 14.6 GeV/c antiprotons. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 24(2). 202–212. 2 indexed citations
12.
Koller, E. L., S. Taylor, Lucia Romano, et al.. (1972). Analysis of the pion spectrum of 39 819 τ+ decays at rest. Nuclear Physics B. 36(1). 1–10. 1 indexed citations
13.
Koller, E. L., S. Taylor, D. Pandoulas, et al.. (1970). Analysis of 17 898τ+Decays at Rest. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 1(5). 1277–1284. 2 indexed citations
14.
Pandoulas, D., et al.. (1970). Branching Ratios forK+→3πDecays. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 2(7). 1205–1211.
15.
Taylor, S., E. L. Koller, D. Pandoulas, et al.. (1969). Evidence for Violation of theΔI=12Rule inK+→3πDecay. Physical Review Letters. 23(13). 737–738. 9 indexed citations
16.
Taylor, S., et al.. (1966). On the analysis of K and η → 3π decay spectra. Nuclear Physics. 83(3). 690–694. 1 indexed citations
17.
Taylor, S., et al.. (1965). Search for Anomalousπ+Decay amongτ+Decay Secondaries. Physical Review Letters. 14(18). 745–746. 10 indexed citations
18.
Stamer, P., et al.. (1965). Observations of Radiativeτ+Decays. Physical Review. 138(2B). B440–B441. 11 indexed citations
19.
Koller, E. L., et al.. (1963). Radiativeτ+Decay. Physical Review. 129(3). 1381–1382. 3 indexed citations
20.
Koller, E. L., et al.. (1962). Evidence forK+→π+π−+e++νDecay Mode. Physical Review Letters. 9(7). 328–330. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. L. Koller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R.W. Kraemer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. R. Larsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Paoluzi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Camilleri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Szklarz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Reithler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. D. Schamberger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Fukawa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Gregory
Rankless by CCL
2026