P. Popham

21 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

P. Popham
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 54
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 69
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 44
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 41
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 94
Replace J. Gardiner with:
J. Gardiner Ireland
William C. Paganelli United States
Enrico Monaca Germany
G. R. Lyons United Kingdom
Mustafa Kemal Bayar Türkiye
C. Orlikowski Australia
Oranuch Kyokong Thailand
S. Klöhr Germany
Tânia Cursino de Menezes Couceiro Brazil
J Payen France
P. Popham relative to J. Gardiner Ireland J. Gardiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Gardiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Popham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Popham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Popham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Popham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Popham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Popham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Popham. The network helps show where P. Popham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Popham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Popham Line = papers co-authored together P. Popham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201092
2 20083
3 200862
4
Fracture of an epidural catheter inserted for labour analgesia.
20082
5 200727
6 200736
7 200627
8 20046
9
Conversion from suction catheter to guidewire for difficult tracheostomy tube change.
20044
10 200312
11 20012
12 20011
13 19985
14 19965
15 19963
16 19963
17 199419
18 199440
19 199253
20 19801

About P. Popham

P. Popham is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hematology, Internal Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (54 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (69 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (44 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (41 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (94 citations). P. Popham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include A. Buettner, Colin Royse, F. A. Barron, James D Griffiths, Juliana Bender Hoppe, Richard C. Bruce, Paul McLoughlin, D. M. Band, R. A. F. Linton and Keith Nicholson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Clinical Science and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026