This map shows the geographic impact of P. Glodek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Glodek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Glodek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Glodek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Glodek. The network helps show where P. Glodek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Glodek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Glodek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Glodek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Glodek. P. Glodek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glodek, P., Wiebke M. Wemheuer, G. Gandini, et al.. (2001). Pig semen banks in Europe.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 111–120.2 indexed citations
2.
Gandini, G., et al.. (2001). Pig genetic resources in Italy. Florence Research (University of Florence). 104. 33–40.7 indexed citations
3.
Barba, C., et al.. (2001). Performances of the Iberian and other local breeds of Spain.. 77–83.4 indexed citations
4.
Kallweit, Erhard, et al.. (2000). Meat production and returns of pig crosses with specific quality characteristics as compared to present standard and quality label market supplies. Züchtungskunde. 72(4). 290–307.1 indexed citations
5.
Henning, M., et al.. (2000). Meat quality in pig crosses with special quality characteristics as compared to present standard and brand pork supply.. Archives animal breeding/Archiv für Tierzucht. 43(5). 463–476.6 indexed citations
6.
Guillouet, Philippe, P. Glodek, G. Gandini, et al.. (2000). Gene banks for European endangered breeds of pigs. The situation in France, Germany, Italy and Spain.. 32. 419–427.2 indexed citations
7.
Täubert, Helge, H. Brandt, & P. Glodek. (1999). ESTIMATION OF GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR FARROWING TRAITS IN PUREBRED AND CROSSBRED SOWS AND ESTIMATION OF THEIR GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS. 53(3). 205–209.2 indexed citations
8.
Brandt, H., et al.. (1997). Genetic and phenotypic investigation of performance-, semen- and fertility characters of artificial insemination boars. I. Systematic effects and genetic parameters. 40(5). 421–432.3 indexed citations
Glodek, P.. (1991). Effects of biotechnology upon animal breeding and production.1 indexed citations
13.
Glodek, P., et al.. (1990). Efficiency of selection based on initial milk yield of first-calf heifers. 2. Relationship of initial production with persistency of lactation. Züchtungskunde. 62(2). 118–128.1 indexed citations
14.
Glodek, P., et al.. (1986). Untersuchungen zum Halothantest in verschiedenen deutschen Schweinepopulationen : 3. Mitteilung: Beziehungen zwischen der Halothanreaktion und dem Genotyp an bekannten Markerloci. OpenAgrar.1 indexed citations
Averdunk, G., et al.. (1979). Der Index für die Körung von Ebern. 27(12). 412–419.1 indexed citations
19.
Glodek, P., et al.. (1975). The development of selection criteria for the breeding of riding horses. III. Construction of selection indices for performance-tested young stallions.. Züchtungskunde. 47(3). 164–171.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.