Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene underlies Branchio-Oto-Renal (BOR) syndrome and identifies a novel gene family
1997467 citationsSonia Abdelhak, Vasiliki Kalatzis et al.Nature Geneticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P Bedbeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P Bedbeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P Bedbeder more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P Bedbeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P Bedbeder. The network helps show where P Bedbeder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P Bedbeder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P Bedbeder.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P Bedbeder based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P Bedbeder. P Bedbeder is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alsamad, Issam Abd, et al.. (1999). Management of sinonasal hemangiopericytomas.. PubMed. 37(4). 153–8.28 indexed citations
3.
Abdelhak, Sonia, Vasiliki Kalatzis, Roland Heilig, et al.. (1997). A human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene underlies Branchio-Oto-Renal (BOR) syndrome and identifies a novel gene family. Nature Genetics. 15(2). 157–164.467 indexed citations breakdown →
Cohen, Robert, et al.. (1992). [Prevention of acute otitis media. Amoxicillin versus glycoproteins from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Study in children under 5 years of age].. PubMed. 21(11). 509–14.1 indexed citations
6.
Cohen, Robert, F. de La Rocque, M. Boucherat, et al.. (1991). [An open randomized trial, Pediazole versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children].. PubMed. 38(2). 115–9.3 indexed citations
7.
Bedbeder, P, et al.. (1989). [Results and indications of curietherapy of the eustachian tube with iridium 192 in chronic otitis in the adult].. PubMed. 106(6). 275–80.1 indexed citations
8.
Bedbeder, P, et al.. (1989). [The CO2 broncholaser in the treatment of subglottic and tracheal stenosis. Apropos of 14 cases].. PubMed. 106(7). 518–22.1 indexed citations
9.
Pruvost, P, et al.. (1989). [Benign pulsatile cranial bruit in children. Apropos of 6 cases].. PubMed. 46(8). 579–82.3 indexed citations
10.
Laccourreye, O., et al.. (1987). [Critical study and role of partial vertical reconstructive laryngectomies with epiglottoplasty by the Tucker method. Apropos of 18 cases].. PubMed. 104(5). 323–8.1 indexed citations
11.
Géhanno, P, et al.. (1982). [Recovery total glossectomy with immediate reconstruction by means of a musculocutaneous flap : functional results and perspectives (author's transl)].. PubMed. 99(3). 85–8.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.