Citations per year, relative to Otto Neurath Otto Neurath (= 1×)
peers
William Warren Bartley
Countries citing papers authored by Otto Neurath
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Neurath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Neurath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Neurath more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Neurath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Neurath. The network helps show where Otto Neurath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Otto Neurath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Otto Neurath.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Otto Neurath based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Otto Neurath. Otto Neurath is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carnap, Rudolf & Otto Neurath. (2024). Briefwechsel. Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks.
Neurath, Otto, et al.. (2010). From Hieroglyphics to Isotype: A Visual Autobiography. Medical Entomology and Zoology.32 indexed citations
7.
Neurath, Otto, et al.. (2002). Pseudorracionalismo de la falsación.. Redes Revista de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. 9(19). 105–118.1 indexed citations
8.
Neurath, Otto, et al.. (1998). Gesammelte ökonomische, soziologische und sozialpolitische Schriften.
9.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Haller, & Robin Kinross. (1991). Gesammelte bildpädagogische Schriften.8 indexed citations
10.
Carnap, Rudolf, et al.. (1985). Manifeste du Cercle de Vienne Et Autres Écrits. Presses Universitaires de France eBooks.6 indexed citations
Neurath, Otto, et al.. (1982). Arbeiterbildung in der Zwischenkriegszeit - Otto Neurath - Gerd Arntz.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
13.
Neurath, Otto, et al.. (1981). Gesammelte Philosophische Und Methodologische Schriften.57 indexed citations
14.
Neurath, Otto & Rainer Hegselmann. (1979). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus. Suhrkamp eBooks.18 indexed citations
15.
Ryan, Alan, et al.. (1976). Positivism and Sociology.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 26(103). 194–194.1 indexed citations
16.
Rodríguez, Lorenzo Cachón & Otto Neurath. (1975). Fundamentos de las ciencias sociales. Revista española de la opinión pública. 223–223.3 indexed citations
Neurath, Otto, Charles W. Morris, & Rudolf Carnap. (1971). Foundations of the Unity of Science Toward an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Edited by Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap [and] Charles Morris. --.2 indexed citations
19.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Carnap, & Charles W. Morris. (1955). Foundations of the unity of science : toward an international encyclopedia of unified science. University of Chicago Press eBooks.52 indexed citations
20.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Carnap, & Charles Morris. (1955). International encyclopedia of unified science : volume 1, nos. 1-10. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.