Otomar J. Bartos
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Paul WehrBernard P. CohenPeter AbellD. J. BartholomewThomas P. WilsonThéodore CaplowPhilip J. StoneThomas E. Drabek
- Topics
- Game Theory and Applications (3 papers)Global and Cross-Cultural Management (1 paper)Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Otomar J. Bartos
19 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Sociology and Political Science 171
- Political Science and International Relations 62
- Management Science and Operations Research 61
- Economics and Econometrics 58
- Artificial Intelligence 52
Countries citing papers authored by Otomar J. Bartos
This map shows the geographic impact of Otomar J. Bartos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otomar J. Bartos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otomar J. Bartos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Otomar J. Bartos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otomar J. Bartos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otomar J. Bartos. The network helps show where Otomar J. Bartos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Otomar J. Bartos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Otomar J. Bartos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Otomar J. Bartos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Otomar J. Bartos. Otomar J. Bartos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Otomar J. Bartos
Otomar J. Bartos is a scholar working on Public Administration, Management Science and Operations Research and Management Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (1 paper) and Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (171 citations) and Safety Research (30 citations). Otomar J. Bartos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Wehr, Bernard P. Cohen, Peter Abell, D. J. Bartholomew, Thomas P. Wilson, Théodore Caplow, Philip J. Stone, Thomas E. Drabek, Richard A. Kalish and Robert C. Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.