Andrew J. Vickers

76.6k citations
748 papers · 48.7k · 18 hit papers · h-index 102

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew J. Vickers

705 papers receiving 47.3k citations

Andrew J. Vickers's Hit Papers

Decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of prediction models 2021 · 168 citations
1680+6+13Years since publication10002.0k3.0k

Peers

Andrew J. Vickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 6.7k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 17.1k
  • Health Informatics 462
  • Urology 1.9k
  • Statistics and Probability 2.2k
Replace Jonathan A C Sterne with:
Jonathan A C Sterne United Kingdom
Jonathan J Deeks United Kingdom
Andrew D Oxman Norway
Doug Altman United Kingdom
Kenneth F. Schulz United States
Holger J. Schünemann Canada
George A. Wells Canada
Stuart Pocock United Kingdom
Peter Jüni Switzerland
Lesley Stewart United Kingdom
Andrew J. Vickers relative to Jonathan A C Sterne United Kingdom Jonathan A C Sterne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jonathan A C Sterne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Vickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Vickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Vickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Vickers. The network helps show where Andrew J. Vickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew J. Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew J. Vickers Line = papers co-authored together Andrew J. Vickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 748 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models
Hit paper breakdown →
20063310
2
Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models
Hit paper breakdown →
20093217
3
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
Hit paper breakdown →
20153148
4
Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements
Hit paper breakdown →
20011538
5
Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study
Hit paper breakdown →
20061163
6
Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers
Hit paper breakdown →
2008989
7
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
Hit paper breakdown →
2015945
8
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain
Hit paper breakdown →
2012743
9
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators
Hit paper breakdown →
2018723
10
Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: prediction, detection and monitoring
Hit paper breakdown →
2008691
11
Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests
Hit paper breakdown →
2016662
12
A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2019539
13
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
Hit paper breakdown →
2014536
14
Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Hit paper breakdown →
1998518
15
Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2017510
16 2001402
17
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2014401
18 2008342
19 2006318
20 2009313

About Andrew J. Vickers

Andrew J. Vickers is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Statistics and Probability, having authored 748 papers that have together received 48.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (283 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (227 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (107 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (83 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (80 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (74 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (67 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (58 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (6.7k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (17.1k citations), Health Informatics (462 citations), Urology (1.9k citations) and Statistics and Probability (2.2k citations). Andrew J. Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Elena B. Elkin, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Douglas G. Altman, Peter T. Scardino, Hans Lilja, Angel M. Cronin, Michael W. Kattan, Mithat Gönen, Ben Van Calster and James A. Eastham. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, European Urology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and British Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact