Osman DEMİR
About
In The Last Decade
Osman DEMİR
9 papers receiving 248 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Education 62
- Social Psychology 43
- Sociology and Political Science 43
- Oral Surgery 33
- Clinical Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Osman DEMİR
This map shows the geographic impact of Osman DEMİR's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Osman DEMİR with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osman DEMİR more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Osman DEMİR
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Osman DEMİR. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Osman DEMİR. The network helps show where Osman DEMİR may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Osman DEMİR
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Osman DEMİR. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Osman DEMİR based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Osman DEMİR. Osman DEMİR is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Fit Indices: Review breakdown → | 208 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.