Oonagh Redmond

1.0k citations
23 papers · 894 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Oonagh Redmond

23 papers receiving 832 citations

Peers

Oonagh Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 435
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 161
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
  • Neurology 57
Replace David M. Kean with:
David M. Kean United Kingdom
Joseph T. Ennis Ireland
Alexander de Crespigny United States
Lalith Talagala United States
Nicholas J. Yasillo United States
A. Alavi United States
Karin Knešaurek United States
F. Gückel Germany
Hiroshi Hamakawa Japan
Hans‐Wilhelm Müller‐Gärtner Germany
Oonagh Redmond relative to David M. Kean United Kingdom David M. Kean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David M. Kean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oonagh Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oonagh Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oonagh Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oonagh Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oonagh Redmond. The network helps show where Oonagh Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oonagh Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oonagh Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Oonagh Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990216
2 1994141
3 199582
4 199063
5 199144
6 198940
7 199238
8 199336
9 199535
10 199032
11 198831
12 199227
13 199122
14 199522
15 199221
16 199117
17 199210
18 19897
19 19923
20 19943

About Oonagh Redmond

Oonagh Redmond is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (435 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations) and Neurology (57 citations). Oonagh Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J.P. Stack, J. T. Ennis, Peter A. Dervan, Conall Larkin, Joseph T. Ennis, Mary Codd, John L. Waddington, Eadbhard O’Callaghan, P.F. Buckley and Anthony Kinsella. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Biological Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact