On Ja Kim
About
In The Last Decade
On Ja Kim
8 papers receiving 555 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Molecular Biology 322
- Surgery 113
- Oncology 112
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 80
- Nephrology 70
Countries citing papers authored by On Ja Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of On Ja Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On Ja Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On Ja Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by On Ja Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by On Ja Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by On Ja Kim. The network helps show where On Ja Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of On Ja Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of On Ja Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of On Ja Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with On Ja Kim. On Ja Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | beta-Catenin mutation is a frequent cause of Wnt pathway activation in gastric cancer. | 312 |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 83 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.