Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Compressive Strain at the Onset of Densification of Cellular Solids
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Harrigan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Harrigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Harrigan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Harrigan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Harrigan. The network helps show where Jane Harrigan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Harrigan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Harrigan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Harrigan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Harrigan. Jane Harrigan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harrigan, Jane. (2014). An Economic Analysis of National Food Sovereignty Policies in the Middle East: The Case of Lebanon and Jordan. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).3 indexed citations
Harrigan, Jane & Hamed El‐Said. (2009). Aid and power in the Arab world: IMF and World bank policy-based lending in the Middle East and North Africa. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London). 224.2 indexed citations
5.
Harrigan, Jane & Hamed El‐Said. (2009). Aid and power in the Arab world: World Bank and IMF policy-based lending in the Middle East and North Africa. Palgrave eBooks.6 indexed citations
Booth, David, et al.. (2006). Drivers of Change and Development in Malawi.57 indexed citations
9.
Harrigan, Jane & Hamed El‐Said. (2006). The IMF and the World Bank in Jordan: A Case of Over-Optimism. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).4 indexed citations
Harrigan, Jane, et al.. (2001). The Determinants of Export Performance: Results of a 1997 Survey of Malawian Exporters.1 indexed citations
12.
Harrigan, Jane. (2001). From Dictatorship to Democracy: Economic Policy in Malawi 1964-2000. SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London).52 indexed citations
13.
Harrigan, Jane & Hamed El‐Said. (2000). Stabilisation and Structural Adjustment: The Case of Jordan and Malawi. Journal of African Business. 1(3).1 indexed citations
14.
Nixson, Frederick, et al.. (1999). The Industrial Sector and Economic Development. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
Mosley, Paul, Jane Harrigan, & John Toye. (1995). Analysis and policy proposals. Routledge eBooks.3 indexed citations
18.
Harrigan, Jane, et al.. (1995). Aid and power: the World Bank and policy-based lending. Volume 1: analysis and policy proposals..34 indexed citations
19.
Harrigan, Jane, et al.. (1992). Agricultural price policy: Government and the market.6 indexed citations
20.
Harrigan, Jane. (1988). Malawi: The Impact of Price Policy on Smallholder Agriculture 1971-1988.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.