Olga E. Scholten
- Plant Science top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Insect Science top 10%
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Co-authors
- W. LangeC. Gerard van der LindenC.C.M. van de WielC. KikGuillermo A. GalvánT. BockR. M. Klein-LankhorstL. C. P. Keizer
- Topics
- Garlic and Onion Studies (15 papers)Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (13 papers)Plant Virus Research Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Olga E. Scholten
46 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Plant Science 1.2k
- Cell Biology 254
- Molecular Biology 197
- Insect Science 85
- Endocrinology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Olga E. Scholten
This map shows the geographic impact of Olga E. Scholten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olga E. Scholten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olga E. Scholten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Olga E. Scholten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olga E. Scholten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olga E. Scholten. The network helps show where Olga E. Scholten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olga E. Scholten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olga E. Scholten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olga E. Scholten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olga E. Scholten. Olga E. Scholten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 176 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | Breeding onions for low input agriculture: Genetic analysis of the interaction between Allium species and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi | 1 |
| 12 | 70 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | Breeding for improved responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in onion | 3 |
| 15 | Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on growth and development of onion and wild relatives | 1 |
| 16 | Screening for resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring wheat cultivars | 2 |
| 17 | Food safety of cereals: a chain wide approach to reduce Fusarium mycotoxins | 15 |
| 18 | 64 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Olga E. Scholten
Olga E. Scholten is a scholar working on Horticulture, Endocrinology and Plant Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Garlic and Onion Studies (15 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (13 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.2k citations), Endocrinology (84 citations) and Cell Biology (254 citations). Olga E. Scholten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include W. Lange, C. Gerard van der Linden, C.C.M. van de Wiel, C. Kik, Guillermo A. Galván, T. Bock, R. M. Klein-Lankhorst, L. C. P. Keizer, Thomas W. Kuyper and J.A.L. van Kan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, New Phytologist and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.