Oleg Špakov
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Darius MiniotasPäivi MajarantaPoika IsokoskiKari‐Jouko RäihäI. Scott MacKenzieJussi RantalaJari KangasDeepak Akkil
- Topics
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (53 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (34 papers)Interactive and Immersive Displays (21 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaIEEE Sensors JournalBehavior Research Methods
In The Last Decade
Oleg Špakov
60 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Human-Computer Interaction 985
- Cognitive Neuroscience 581
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 226
- Ophthalmology 101
- Social Psychology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Oleg Špakov
This map shows the geographic impact of Oleg Špakov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oleg Špakov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oleg Špakov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oleg Špakov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oleg Špakov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oleg Špakov. The network helps show where Oleg Špakov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oleg Špakov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oleg Špakov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oleg Špakov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oleg Špakov. Oleg Špakov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | SCROLLABLE KEYBOARDS FOR CASUAL EYE TYPING | 18 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 85 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | Symbol Creator: An Alternative Eye-based Text Entry Technique with Low Demand for Screen Space. | 18 |
About Oleg Špakov
Oleg Špakov is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (53 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (34 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (985 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (581 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (39 citations). Oleg Špakov has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Canada and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Darius Miniotas, Päivi Majaranta, Poika Isokoski, Kari‐Jouko Räihä, I. Scott MacKenzie, Jussi Rantala, Jari Kangas, Deepak Akkil, Selina Sharmin and Howell Istance. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Sensors Journal and Behavior Research Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.