Howell Istance

1.3k total citations
48 papers, 922 citations indexed

About

Howell Istance is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Howell Istance has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 922 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Howell Istance's work include Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (35 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (7 papers). Howell Istance is often cited by papers focused on Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (35 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (7 papers). Howell Istance collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Howell Istance's co-authors include Richard Bates, Aulikki Hyrskykari, Stephen Vickers, Peter A. Howarth, Kari‐Jouko Räihä, Qiang Ji, Carlos H. Morimoto, Harri Siirtola, Oleg Špakov and Roope Raisamo and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Computer Vision and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

In The Last Decade

Howell Istance

45 papers receiving 866 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Howell Istance United Kingdom 18 704 390 209 115 70 48 922
Jussi Rantala Finland 20 630 0.9× 596 1.5× 124 0.6× 282 2.5× 71 1.0× 73 1.2k
Sampath Jayarathna United States 17 448 0.6× 453 1.2× 182 0.9× 86 0.7× 7 0.1× 80 1.1k
Nicholas A. Giudice United States 23 449 0.6× 968 2.5× 186 0.9× 150 1.3× 14 0.2× 68 1.4k
Linda E. Sibert United States 8 840 1.2× 433 1.1× 290 1.4× 122 1.1× 3 0.0× 15 1.0k
Francisco R. Ortega United States 12 348 0.5× 142 0.4× 208 1.0× 129 1.1× 16 0.2× 78 708
Romedi Passini Canada 12 162 0.2× 295 0.8× 147 0.7× 115 1.0× 131 1.9× 20 1.2k
Anke Huckauf Germany 20 439 0.6× 620 1.6× 214 1.0× 171 1.5× 3 0.0× 85 1.0k
Ilona Heldal Norway 16 519 0.7× 120 0.3× 180 0.9× 169 1.5× 15 0.2× 93 823
Duane R. Geruschat United States 18 119 0.2× 428 1.1× 89 0.4× 149 1.3× 20 0.3× 38 1.1k
Aulikki Hyrskykari Finland 16 660 0.9× 314 0.8× 196 0.9× 71 0.6× 24 838

Countries citing papers authored by Howell Istance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Howell Istance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howell Istance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howell Istance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Howell Istance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howell Istance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howell Istance. The network helps show where Howell Istance may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Howell Istance

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Howell Istance. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Howell Istance based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Howell Istance. Howell Istance is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yang, Yingjie, et al.. (2021). Two-stage salient object identification and segmentation based on irregularity. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 80(24). 33275–33295.
2.
Špakov, Oleg, et al.. (2019). Eye gaze and head gaze in collaborative games. 1–9. 8 indexed citations
3.
Chiclana, Francisco, et al.. (2019). Real-Time 3D Head Pose Tracking Through 2.5D Constrained Local Models with Local Neural Fields. International Journal of Computer Vision. 127(6-7). 579–598. 3 indexed citations
4.
Špakov, Oleg, Howell Istance, Aulikki Hyrskykari, Harri Siirtola, & Kari‐Jouko Räihä. (2018). Improving the performance of eye trackers with limited spatial accuracy and low sampling rates for reading analysis by heuristic fixation-to-word mapping. Behavior Research Methods. 51(6). 2661–2687. 15 indexed citations
5.
Špakov, Oleg, et al.. (2018). Enabling unsupervised eye tracker calibration by school children through games. 1–9. 1 indexed citations
6.
Räihä, Kari‐Jouko, Oleg Špakov, Howell Istance, & Diederick C. Niehorster. (2017). Gaze-assisted remote communication between teacher and students. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 2 indexed citations
7.
Špakov, Oleg, Harri Siirtola, Howell Istance, & Kari‐Jouko Räihä. (2017). Visualizing the Reading Activity of People Learning to Read. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 10(5). 10 indexed citations
8.
Ma, Zhong, et al.. (2015). What were we all looking at? Identifying objects of collective visual attention. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 28(3). 547–560. 3 indexed citations
9.
Vickers, Stephen, Howell Istance, & Michael James Heron. (2013). Accessible gaming for people with physical and cognitive disabilities. 19–24. 13 indexed citations
10.
Vickers, Stephen, et al.. (2010). EyeGuitar. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 36–39. 21 indexed citations
11.
Prendinger, Helmut, et al.. (2009). Attentive interfaces for users with disabilities: eye gaze for intention and uncertainty estimation. Universal Access in the Information Society. 8(4). 339–354. 15 indexed citations
12.
Istance, Howell, Richard Bates, Aulikki Hyrskykari, & Stephen Vickers. (2008). Snap clutch, a moded approach to solving the Midas touch problem. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 221–221. 94 indexed citations
13.
Bates, Richard, et al.. (2007). Introducing COGAIN: communication by gaze interaction. Universal Access in the Information Society. 6(2). 159–166. 24 indexed citations
14.
Ayesh, Aladdin, et al.. (2005). Simulation and visualization of a scalable real time multiple robot system. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 1 indexed citations
15.
Ayesh, Aladdin, et al.. (2005). Simulation and Visualization of a large scale Real Time Multi-Robot system. Eurographics. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bates, Richard & Howell Istance. (2005). Towards eye based virtual environment interaction for users with high-level motor disabilities. International Journal on Disability and Human Development. 4(3). 11 indexed citations
17.
Bates, R. L. & Howell Istance. (2002). Zooming interfaces!.
18.
Bates, Richard & Howell Istance. (2002). Zooming interfaces!. 119–126. 65 indexed citations
19.
Steed, Anthony, et al.. (2000). Usability evaluation for virtual environments: methods, results and future directions (part 1). UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations
20.
Howarth, Peter A. & Howell Istance. (1986). The Validity of Subjective Reports of Visual Discomfort. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 28(3). 347–351. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026