O. Nascimben

769 citations
21 papers · 352 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

O. Nascimben

21 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

O. Nascimben
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Cancer Research 115
  • Reproductive Medicine 63
  • Otorhinolaryngology 28
  • Oncology 173
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76
Replace A. Biete with:
A. Biete Spain
Thomas Hendrik Knocke Austria
Oyeon Cho South Korea
Shahin Shajahan United States
Kunal Saigal United States
Hans Strauß Germany
Yu Ohkubo Japan
Christina Kaiser Germany
Julie Cuartero Canada
Viorica Nagy Romania
O. Nascimben relative to A. Biete Spain A. Biete's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
A. Biete · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Nascimben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Nascimben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Nascimben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Nascimben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Nascimben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Nascimben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Nascimben. The network helps show where O. Nascimben may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Nascimben, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Nascimben Line = papers co-authored together O. Nascimben links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200815
2 20074
3 200430
4 200421
5
Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay of p53: prognostic significance in 220 node-negative breast cancer tissue.
19984
6 199846
7 199812
8
ErbB2 assay in breast cancer: possibly improved clinical information using a quantitative method.
199728
9 199733
10 19946
11
Biochemical parameters for prognostic evaluation in patients with breast cancer.
19945
12 199310
13 19932
14 19938
15 199320
16 199142
17 19916
18 19906
19 199014
20 198830

About O. Nascimben

O. Nascimben is a scholar working on Oncology, Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Otorhinolaryngology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (115 citations), Reproductive Medicine (63 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (28 citations), Oncology (173 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (76 citations). O. Nascimben has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Malaysia and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Gatti, R. Mione, Antonette E. Leon, Orazio Vinante, Massimo Gion, Ruggero Dittadi, Giovanni Pappagallo, María Gión, Giorgio Mustacchi and Salvatore Tumolo. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026