Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
3D tumor spheroid models for in vitro therapeutic screening: a systematic approach to enhance the biological relevance of data obtained
2016838 citationsMichele Zanoni, Filippo Piccinini et al.Scientific Reportsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Polico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Polico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Polico more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Polico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Polico. The network helps show where R. Polico may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Polico
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Polico.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Polico based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Polico. R. Polico is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zanoni, Michele, Filippo Piccinini, Chiara Arienti, et al.. (2016). 3D tumor spheroid models for in vitro therapeutic screening: a systematic approach to enhance the biological relevance of data obtained. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 19103–19103.838 indexed citations breakdown →
Salvagno, Luigi, Mariella Sorarů, C. Puccetti, et al.. (1999). Gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: analysis of 252 patients from a multicenter study.. PubMed. 85(2). 113–21.14 indexed citations
12.
Antonello, Michele, et al.. (1996). [Radiation treatment in the carcinoma of paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity].. PubMed. 16(4). 347–54.2 indexed citations
13.
Polico, R., et al.. (1996). [Epistaxis in Rendu-Weber-Osler disease. The role of brachytherapy].. PubMed. 16(6). 513–6.2 indexed citations
14.
Antonello, Michele, et al.. (1995). [The use of a single anterior oblique field in the treatment of T1aN0 vocal cord neoplasms. Results and comparison with other technics].. PubMed. 90(1-2). 102–7.1 indexed citations
15.
Pizzi, G, et al.. (1995). [Brachytherapy of epistaxis in Rendu-Osler disease. Indications, technic, results].. PubMed. 89(6). 861–4.5 indexed citations
16.
Polico, R., et al.. (1995). [The polycentric multiple arc complanar technic, or telebrachytherapy. A 4-year experience (an innovative way for the local control of solid neoplasms)].. PubMed. 90(1-2). 113–23.4 indexed citations
17.
Marchetti, Cláudia, et al.. (1994). [Brachytherapy in choroid tumors].. PubMed. 88(6). 858–62.
18.
Antonello, Michele, et al.. (1992). [Results of conservative treatment of stage I-II carcinoma of the breast. Analysis of 311 patients].. PubMed. 84(4). 440–3.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.