Núria Tort‐Colet
About
In The Last Decade
Núria Tort‐Colet
11 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 152
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 75
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 17
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 13
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Núria Tort‐Colet
This map shows the geographic impact of Núria Tort‐Colet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Núria Tort‐Colet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Núria Tort‐Colet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Núria Tort‐Colet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Núria Tort‐Colet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Núria Tort‐Colet. The network helps show where Núria Tort‐Colet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Núria Tort‐Colet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Núria Tort‐Colet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Núria Tort‐Colet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Núria Tort‐Colet. Núria Tort‐Colet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 11 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.