N.S. Klazinga
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 4
- Co-authors
- Hub WollersheimRichard GrolKiki M. J. M. H. LombartsOnyebuchi A. ArahKarlijn OvereemJoke HaafkensGerben ter RietC. J. Moerman
- Journals
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care (4 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Dental Research (1 paper)Journal of Women s Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
N.S. Klazinga
12 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Family Practice 37
- Health Information Management 75
- Pharmacy 46
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 121
- General Health Professions 100
Countries citing papers authored by N.S. Klazinga
This map shows the geographic impact of N.S. Klazinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.S. Klazinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.S. Klazinga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N.S. Klazinga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.S. Klazinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.S. Klazinga. The network helps show where N.S. Klazinga may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.S. Klazinga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 7 | Ervaringenlijst diabetes. Onderzoek naar het discriminerend vermogen | 2006 | 1 |
| 8 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 12 | Beroerte, beroering en borging in de keten. Resultaten van de Edisse-studie van drie regionale experimenten met stroke service. Edisse: Evaluation dutch integrated stroke service experiments | 2001 | 10 |
| 13 | 2000 | 71 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 2 |
About N.S. Klazinga
N.S. Klazinga is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Family Practice, Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Periodontics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (37 citations), Health Information Management (75 citations), Pharmacy (46 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (121 citations) and General Health Professions (100 citations). N.S. Klazinga has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hub Wollersheim, Richard Grol, Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts, Onyebuchi A. Arah, Karlijn Overeem, Joke Haafkens, Gerben ter Riet, C. J. Moerman, Rita Schepers and Robbert Huijsman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Quality in Health Care, BMJ Quality & Safety, Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Dental Research and Journal of Women s Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.