Norman Habel
- Religious studies top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Development top 5%
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers)Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical LiteratureVetus TestamentumInterpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Norman Habel
20 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Religious studies 140
- Sociology and Political Science 106
- Archeology 44
- Philosophy 32
- Development 28
Countries citing papers authored by Norman Habel
This map shows the geographic impact of Norman Habel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norman Habel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norman Habel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Norman Habel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norman Habel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norman Habel. The network helps show where Norman Habel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norman Habel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norman Habel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norman Habel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norman Habel. Norman Habel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guiding Ecojustice Principles | 7 |
| 2 | Introducing ecological hermeneutics | 16 |
| 3 | An Inconvenient Text: Is a Green Reading of the Bible Possible? | 13 |
| 4 | Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics | 25 |
| 5 | Design, Diversity and Dominion: Biodiversity and Job 39 | 1 |
| 6 | The earth story in the New testament | 12 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Myth, ritual and the sacred: introducing the phenomena of religion | 1 |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | The Book of Job | 17 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | Conflict of Religious Cultures: A Study in the Relevance of Ugaritic Materials for the Early Faith of Israel | 0 |
About Norman Habel
Norman Habel is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 22 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (140 citations), Development (28 citations) and Archeology (44 citations). Norman Habel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Henning Graf Reventlow, Edwin M. Good, Walter E. Rast, Marion Maddox and Michael O’Donoghue. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Vetus Testamentum and Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.