Norbert C.J. De Wit
- Hematology
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Nephrology top 10%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Steven ThorntonJohn HeijmansWim A. BuurmanJosé E. Tanus‐SantosMichael JacobsJos G. MaessenIris C. Vermeulen WindsantYuri M. Ganushchak
- Topics
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (8 papers)Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers)Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismClinical Microbiology and InfectionFrontiers in Physiology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Norbert C.J. De Wit
16 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Hematology 69
- Epidemiology 63
- Emergency Medicine 61
- Nephrology 48
- Immunology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Norbert C.J. De Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert C.J. De Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert C.J. De Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert C.J. De Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert C.J. De Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert C.J. De Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert C.J. De Wit. The network helps show where Norbert C.J. De Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert C.J. De Wit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert C.J. De Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert C.J. De Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert C.J. De Wit. Norbert C.J. De Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 107 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 48 |
About Norbert C.J. De Wit
Norbert C.J. De Wit is a scholar working on Hematology, Emergency Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (8 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers) and Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (48 citations), Emergency Medicine (61 citations) and Hematology (69 citations). Norbert C.J. De Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven Thornton, John Heijmans, Wim A. Buurman, José E. Tanus‐Santos, Michael Jacobs, Jos G. Maessen, Iris C. Vermeulen Windsant, Yuri M. Ganushchak, Annemarie A. van Bijnen and Jonas T. Sertório. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Clinical Microbiology and Infection and Frontiers in Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.