Nöel Parker
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Clinical Psychology
- Anthropology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nick Vaughan‐WilliamsRebecca Adler‐NissenBruce MazlishNiels H. AndersenM. HuangFabian Hoppe
- Topics
- Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (4 papers)Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers)Power Line Communications and Noise (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Nöel Parker
16 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 440
- Political Science and International Relations 277
- Clinical Psychology 64
- Anthropology 59
- Demography 48
Countries citing papers authored by Nöel Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Nöel Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nöel Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nöel Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nöel Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nöel Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nöel Parker. The network helps show where Nöel Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nöel Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nöel Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nöel Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nöel Parker. Nöel Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Borderwork and its contraries:boundary-making and the re-imagining of borders | 1 |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 191 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 250 | |
| 11 | The Geopolitics of Europe’s Identity: Centers, Boundaries, and Margins | 14 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Madan Sarup, An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism | 1 |
| 20 | Portrayals of Revolution: Images, Debates and Patterns of Thought on the French Revolution | 1 |
About Nöel Parker
Nöel Parker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (3 papers) and Power Line Communications and Noise (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (277 citations), Sociology and Political Science (440 citations) and Anthropology (59 citations). Nöel Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Nick Vaughan‐Williams, Rebecca Adler‐Nissen, Bruce Mazlish, Niels H. Andersen, M. Huang and Fabian Hoppe. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies and Geopolitics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.