Noam Berger

1.5k citations
24 papers · 645 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Noam Berger

23 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Noam Berger
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Mathematical Physics 395
  • Statistics and Probability 266
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 225
  • Condensed Matter Physics 197
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 69
Replace Thomas Mountford with:
Thomas Mountford United States
Peter Mörters United Kingdom
Vladas Sidoravičius Brazil
Vlada Limic France
Serguei Popov Brazil
Yuri Suhov United Kingdom
Frank Redig Netherlands
Alan Stacey United Kingdom
Andreas Greven Germany
Johan Jonasson Sweden
Noam Berger relative to Thomas Mountford United States Thomas Mountford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Thomas Mountford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noam Berger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noam Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noam Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noam Berger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noam Berger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noam Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noam Berger. The network helps show where Noam Berger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Noam Berger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noam Berger Line = papers co-authored together Noam Berger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005113
2 200696
3 200779
4 200476
5 200164
6 200257
7 200342
8 200527
9 201320
10 201313
11 200811
12 20079
13 20069
14 20087
15 20225
16 20175
17 20173
18 20162
19 20132
20 20222

About Noam Berger

Noam Berger is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (18 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (12 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (9 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers) and Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (395 citations), Statistics and Probability (266 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (225 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (197 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (69 citations). Noam Berger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marek Biskup, Jennifer Chayes, Christian Borgs, Itaï Benjamini, Yuval Peres, Amin Saberi, Elchanan Mossel, Claire Kenyon, Robert Kleinberg and Raissa M. D’Souza. Their work appears in journals such as Probability Theory and Related Fields, The Annals of Probability, Electronic Journal of Probability, Communications in Mathematical Physics and Random Structures and Algorithms.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact