Noah Wayne

442 citations
8 papers · 317 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Noah Wayne

8 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Noah Wayne
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Applied Psychology 90
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 126
  • General Health Professions 188
  • Family Practice 15
  • Clinical Psychology 47
Replace Tracey Parkin with:
Tracey Parkin United Kingdom
Rebecca E. Wilson United States
Sumathy Ravi Australia
Cricket Mitchell United States
Taylor L. Clark United States
Carl J. Brandt Denmark
Rosemary Walker United Kingdom
Mette Haaland‐Øverby Norway
Marloes K Martens Netherlands
Charuwan Kritpracha Thailand
Noah Wayne relative to Tracey Parkin United Kingdom Tracey Parkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Tracey Parkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Wayne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Wayne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Wayne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Wayne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Wayne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Wayne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Wayne. The network helps show where Noah Wayne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Wayne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah Wayne Line = papers co-authored together Noah Wayne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2015153
2 201474
3 201552
4 201315
5 201614
6 20175
7 20213
8 20161

About Noah Wayne

Noah Wayne is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (90 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (126 citations), General Health Professions (188 citations), Family Practice (15 citations) and Clinical Psychology (47 citations). Noah Wayne has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Ritvo, Daniel F Perez, David M. Kaplan, Farah Ahmad, Muhammad Abid Azam, Myriam Mongrain, Meysam Pirbaglou, Crissa L. Guglietti, Jane Irvine and Steven L. Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, JMIR Diabetes, JMIR Research Protocols and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact