Jane Irvine

4.9k citations
62 papers · 3.9k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Irvine

61 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Jane Irvine
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.6k
  • Family Practice 72
  • Applied Psychology 81
  • Health 81
  • Clinical Psychology 207
Replace Sydney H. Croog with:
Sydney H. Croog United States
Hermann Faller Germany
Chantal F. Ski Australia
Kristofer Årestedt Sweden
Frank Doyle Ireland
Misook Lee Chung United States
Linda McGowan United Kingdom
Do Peterson United States
Manfred Stommel United States
Marjorie J. Powers United States
Jane Irvine relative to Sydney H. Croog United States Sydney H. Croog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Sydney H. Croog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Irvine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Irvine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Irvine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Irvine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Irvine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Irvine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Irvine. The network helps show where Jane Irvine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Irvine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Irvine Line = papers co-authored together Jane Irvine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002568
2 2002313
3 2004165
4 2006165
5 1999158
6 1997116
7 2006104
8 200399
9 200499
10 201292
11 200990
12 199986
13 200382
14 200582
15 201182
16 200081
17 200681
18 199879
19 200278
20 200676

About Jane Irvine

Jane Irvine is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Health, Economics and Econometrics and Family Practice, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.6k citations), Family Practice (72 citations), Applied Psychology (81 citations), Health (81 citations) and Clinical Psychology (207 citations). Jane Irvine has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Donna Eileen Stewart, Sherry Lynn Grace, Zachary M. Shnek, Susan E Abbey, Paul Ritvo, Paul Dorian, Renée‐Louise Franche, Brian Baker, Michael Gent and Stuart J. Connolly. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Quality of Life Research and American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact