Ning Ning

1.0k citations
25 papers · 754 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ning Ning

22 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Ning Ning
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 79
  • Immunology 271
  • Oncology 338
  • Biotechnology 52
  • Health 40
Replace Diane F. Hale with:
Diane F. Hale United States
Simon Griffiths United Kingdom
Ann Svensson Sweden
Michael Häder Germany
Gordon C. C. Douglas United States
Jan Brůha Czechia
Van C. Willis United States
Yi‐Hsin Elsa Hsu Taiwan
Eva Henriksen Norway
K. Becker United States
Ning Ning relative to Diane F. Hale United States Diane F. Hale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Diane F. Hale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ning Ning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Ning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Ning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Ning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Ning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Ning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Ning. The network helps show where Ning Ning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Ning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ning Ning Line = papers co-authored together Ning Ning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015182
2 2012177
3 2015124
4 2011123
5
Predicting a stock portfolio with the multivariate bayesian structural time series model: Do news or emotions matter?
201923
6 202021
7 201519
8 201917
9 202114
10
[Realgar nano-particles induce apoptosis and necrosis in leukemia cell lines K562 and HL-60].
200510
11 20187
12 20187
13 20226
14 20194
15 20214
16 20223
17 20203
18 20232
19 20242
20 20232

About Ning Ning

Ning Ning is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Finance, Signal Processing, Oncology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), Stock Market Forecasting Methods (3 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (3 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (3 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (79 citations), Immunology (271 citations), Oncology (338 citations), Biotechnology (52 citations) and Health (40 citations). Ning Ning has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Yingxin Xu, Qin Pan, Alfred E. Chang, Max S. Wicha, Ye Li, Lijun Gao, Libo Liang, Yanhua Hao, Mingli Jiao and Zheng Kang. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, Stem Cells, Clinical Cancer Research and Networks and Spatial Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact