Nina Shapiro
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Finance
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- J. Ron StanfieldJames L. DietzTracy MottWilliam MilbergВ. Б. СмирновВ. А. ТимофееваВ. О. Михайлов
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (10 papers)Political Economy and Marxism (4 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEconomics and EconometricsSociology and Political Science
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Economic IssuesMonthly Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nina Shapiro
17 papers receiving 161 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 158
- Economics and Econometrics 149
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Finance 23
- Political Science and International Relations 14
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Shapiro. The network helps show where Nina Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Shapiro. Nina Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Innovation, New Industries and New Firms | 10 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | Keynes and the Equilibrium Economics | 1 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 95 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 3 |
About Nina Shapiro
Nina Shapiro is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (10 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (158 citations), Economics and Econometrics (149 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (121 citations). Nina Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Ron Stanfield, James L. Dietz, Tracy Mott, William Milberg, В. Б. Смирнов, В. А. Тимофеева and В. О. Михайлов. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Economic Issues and Monthly Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.