Nina S. Parikh
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Health top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Mark V. WilliamsRuth M. ParkerDavid W. BakerJoanne R. NurssTod MijanovichJohn BillingsMarianne C. FahsBernadette Boden‐Albala
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers)Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGhanaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nina S. Parikh
38 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- General Health Professions 1.1k
- Health 229
- Economics and Econometrics 227
- Emergency Medicine 202
- Epidemiology 191
Countries citing papers authored by Nina S. Parikh
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina S. Parikh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina S. Parikh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina S. Parikh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina S. Parikh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina S. Parikh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina S. Parikh. The network helps show where Nina S. Parikh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina S. Parikh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina S. Parikh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina S. Parikh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina S. Parikh. Nina S. Parikh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 87 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 153 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | Emergency department use: the New York Story. | 92 |
| 18 | Emergency department use in New York City: a substitute for primary care? | 142 |
| 19 | Emergency department use in New York City: a survey of Bronx patients. | 28 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Nina S. Parikh
Nina S. Parikh is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health and Rehabilitation, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Family Practice (77 citations) and Health (229 citations). Nina S. Parikh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark V. Williams, Ruth M. Parker, David W. Baker, Joanne R. Nurss, Tod Mijanovich, John Billings, Marianne C. Fahs, Bernadette Boden‐Albala, Donna Shelley and Nancy Giunta. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.