Nina Queisser

945 total citations
22 papers, 747 citations indexed

About

Nina Queisser is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Queisser has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 747 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 10 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Nina Queisser's work include Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (12 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (6 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers). Nina Queisser is often cited by papers focused on Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (12 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (6 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers). Nina Queisser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Nina Queisser's co-authors include Nicole Schupp, Patricia I. Oteiza, Helga Stopper, Gerardo G. Mackenzie, César G. Fraga, Ana M. Adamo, Manuel L. Wolfson, Ahmed Al-Shukaili, Isehaq Al‐Huseini and Badreldin H. Ali and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer Research and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Nina Queisser

22 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

Nina Queisser
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Molecular Biology 280
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 230
  • Surgery 106
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 93
  • Molecular Medicine 85
Replace Niloy Bhattacharjee with:
Niloy Bhattacharjee India
Yu Cao China
Mohamed M. Elseweidy Egypt
Su‐Kyung Shin South Korea
Nejat Kheiripour Iran
Guoguang Wang China
İrfan Değirmenci Türkiye
Yiwei Li China
Ivana Vrhovac Croatia
Masaya Kubota Japan
Niloy Bhattacharjee India View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nina Queisser
Nina Queisser · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nina Queisser
Nina Queisser · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Queisser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Queisser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Queisser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Queisser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Queisser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Queisser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Queisser. The network helps show where Nina Queisser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Queisser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Queisser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Queisser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Queisser. Nina Queisser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 16
3 3
4 11
5 58
6 13
7 27
8 26
9 139
10 58
11 27
12 21
13 28
14 27
15 44
16 62
17 4
18 6
19 125
20 45

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026