Nina Gobat

4.1k total citations
57 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Nina Gobat is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Gobat has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Infectious Diseases and 15 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nina Gobat's work include Disaster Response and Management (14 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (14 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (13 papers). Nina Gobat is often cited by papers focused on Disaster Response and Management (14 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (14 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (13 papers). Nina Gobat collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Nina Gobat's co-authors include Julia Bielicki, Marion Koopmans, Herman Goossens, Evelina Tacconelli, Xavier Duval, Sylvie van der Werf, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, Michael Robling, Paul Kinnersley and John W. Gregory and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Nina Gobat

53 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Nina Gobat
Austin Jones United States
Elise Lankiewicz United States
Don Bambino Geno Tai United States
Aditya Shah United States
Emeline Han United Kingdom
Jennifer Sherwood United States
Brian Honermann United States
Rajneesh Kaur Australia
Sunil Bhopal United Kingdom
Ayesha Khan United States
Austin Jones United States
Nina Gobat
Citations per year, relative to Nina Gobat Nina Gobat (= 1×) peers Austin Jones

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Gobat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Gobat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Gobat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Gobat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Gobat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Gobat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Gobat. The network helps show where Nina Gobat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Gobat

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Gobat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Gobat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Gobat. Nina Gobat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kessel, Gisela van, Steve Milanese, Janine Dizon, et al.. (2025). Community resilience to health emergencies: a scoping review. BMJ Global Health. 10(4). e016963–e016963.
2.
Ali, Joseph, Alun Davies, Paul Glasziou, et al.. (2023). Ethical priorities for international collaborative adaptive platform trials for public health emergencies. BMJ Global Health. 8(7). e012930–e012930.
3.
Davies, Alun, Eli Harriss, Noni Mumba, et al.. (2023). A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(113). 194–194. 6 indexed citations
4.
Hout, Denise van, Paul Hutchinson, Marta Wanat, et al.. (2022). The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures and their wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 17(2). e0245182–e0245182. 11 indexed citations
5.
Collis, Avinash, Kiran Garimella, Alex Moehring, et al.. (2022). Global survey on COVID-19 beliefs, behaviours and norms. Nature Human Behaviour. 6(9). 1310–1317. 36 indexed citations
6.
Tonkin‐Crine, Sarah, Anne‐Marie Martindale, Paul Atkinson, et al.. (2022). How do Healthcare Workers ‘Do’ Guidelines? Exploring How Policy Decisions Impacted UK Healthcare Workers During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Qualitative Health Research. 32(5). 729–743. 10 indexed citations
7.
Edwards, George, et al.. (2021). Primary care preparedness for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a survey of NHS GPs. Family Practice. 39(3). 332–339. 8 indexed citations
9.
Bedson, Jamie, Laura Skrip, Danielle Pedi, et al.. (2021). A review and agenda for integrated disease models including social and behavioural factors. Nature Human Behaviour. 5(7). 834–846. 98 indexed citations
10.
Dada, Sara, et al.. (2021). Learning from the past and present: social science implications for COVID-19 immunity-based documentation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 8(1). 11 indexed citations
11.
Gobat, Nina, et al.. (2021). Risk Communication and Community Engagement During the Migrant Worker COVID-19 Outbreak in Singapore. Science Communication. 44(2). 240–251. 14 indexed citations
12.
Martindale, Anne‐Marie, Hayley Mableson, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, et al.. (2021). Perspectives on COVID-19 testing policies and practices: a qualitative study with scientific advisors and NHS health care workers in England. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 1216–1216. 9 indexed citations
13.
Bielicki, Julia, Xavier Duval, Nina Gobat, et al.. (2020). Monitoring approaches for health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 20(10). e261–e267. 198 indexed citations
14.
Chan, Emily Ying Yang, Nina Gobat, Jean H. Kim, et al.. (2020). Informal home care providers: the forgotten health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 395(10242). 1957–1959. 76 indexed citations
15.
Gobat, Nina, Christopher Butler, Jill Mollison, et al.. (2019). What the public think about participation in medical research during an influenza pandemic: an international cross-sectional survey. Public Health. 177. 80–94. 23 indexed citations
16.
Gobat, Nina, Lauren Copeland, Rebecca Cannings‐John, et al.. (2018). “Focusing” in Motivational Interviewing: development of a training tool for practitioners. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 6(1). 37–37. 2 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, Rhiannon, Lauren Copeland, Aimee Grant, et al.. (2018). Development of a novel motivational interviewing (MI) informed peer-support intervention to support mothers to breastfeed for longer. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 18(1). 90–90. 12 indexed citations
18.
Gobat, Nina, Micaela Gal, Christopher Butler, et al.. (2017). Talking to the people that really matter about their participation in pandemic clinical research: A qualitative study in four European countries. Health Expectations. 21(1). 387–395. 24 indexed citations
19.
Gobat, Nina, Paul Kinnersley, John W. Gregory, & Michael Robling. (2015). What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Education and Counseling. 98(7). 822–829. 56 indexed citations
20.
Gobat, Nina, Micaela Gal, Nick Francis, et al.. (2015). Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness. Trials. 16(1). 591–591. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026