Nils Karl Reimer
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Differences and Values 6
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 12
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research 2
- Critical Race Theory in Education 1
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 2
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 2
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
- Co-authors
- Miles HewstoneKatharina SchmidRalf WölferOliver ChristJulia C. BeckerKristof DhontUlrich KlockeMagdalena Rychlowska
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (3 papers)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2 papers)American Psychologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Nils Karl Reimer
15 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Social Psychology 213
- Sociology and Political Science 309
- Gender Studies 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 76
- Applied Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Nils Karl Reimer
This map shows the geographic impact of Nils Karl Reimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nils Karl Reimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nils Karl Reimer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nils Karl Reimer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nils Karl Reimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nils Karl Reimer. The network helps show where Nils Karl Reimer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nils Karl Reimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 172 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 15 |
About Nils Karl Reimer
Nils Karl Reimer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (213 citations), Sociology and Political Science (309 citations) and Gender Studies (59 citations). Nils Karl Reimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Miles Hewstone, Katharina Schmid, Ralf Wölfer, Oliver Christ, Julia C. Becker, Kristof Dhont, Ulrich Klocke, Magdalena Rychlowska, Nikhil K. Sengupta and Jesse Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.