Nigel Cooper

1.3k total citations
10 papers, 569 citations indexed

About

Nigel Cooper is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nigel Cooper has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 569 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Nigel Cooper's work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers). Nigel Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers). Nigel Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Nigel Cooper's co-authors include Rosalind Bryce, Emily Brady, Jasper O. Kenter, Neil Ravenscroft, Ioan Fazey, Liz O’Brien, Katherine N. Irvine, Mark S. Reed, Mark Everard and Verity Watson and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation and Ecosystem Services.

In The Last Decade

Nigel Cooper

10 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nigel Cooper United Kingdom	8	379	168	141	127	96	10	569
Agata Pietrzyk‐Kaszyńska Poland	13	435 1.1×	105 0.6×	117 0.8×	170 1.3×	58 0.6×	24	622
Paige Olmsted Canada	6	239 0.6×	136 0.8×	115 0.8×	86 0.7×	47 0.5×	8	442
Paola Arias‐Arévalo Colombia	11	458 1.2×	183 1.1×	191 1.4×	112 0.9×	89 0.9×	17	753
Benjamin Cooke Australia	15	351 0.9×	108 0.6×	128 0.9×	68 0.5×	64 0.7×	32	576
Uta Eser Germany	6	235 0.6×	97 0.6×	87 0.6×	68 0.5×	74 0.8×	22	374
Katarina Saltzman Sweden	8	342 0.9×	81 0.5×	58 0.4×	147 1.2×	46 0.5×	15	526
James McGinlay United Kingdom	11	319 0.8×	96 0.6×	81 0.6×	166 1.3×	43 0.4×	17	486
Claudia Cerda Chile	12	252 0.7×	86 0.5×	143 1.0×	73 0.6×	35 0.4×	33	429
David P. Robertson United States	11	247 0.7×	111 0.7×	63 0.4×	53 0.4×	109 1.1×	16	473
Pat Reed United States	7	461 1.2×	110 0.7×	160 1.1×	152 1.2×	28 0.3×	15	715

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Cooper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Cooper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Cooper. The network helps show where Nigel Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Cooper. Nigel Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Kenter, Jasper O., Rosalind Bryce, Mike Christie, et al.. (2016). Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions. Ecosystem Services. 21. 358–371. 148 indexed citations

2.

Cooper, Nigel, et al.. (2016). Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosystem Services. 21. 218–229. 213 indexed citations

3.

Irvine, Katherine N., Liz O’Brien, Neil Ravenscroft, et al.. (2016). Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosystem Services. 21. 184–193. 115 indexed citations

4.

Jones, Aled, et al.. (2015). Revising Payment for Ecosystem Services in the Light of Stewardship: The Need for a Legal Framework. Sustainability. 7(11). 15449–15463. 5 indexed citations

5.

Kenter, Jasper O., Mark S. Reed, Katherine N. Irvine, et al.. (2014). UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Work Package Report 6:Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 39 indexed citations

6.

Cooper, Nigel. (2009). The spiritual value of ecosystem services: an initial Christian exploration.. Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University). 5 indexed citations

7.

Cooper, Nigel. (2000). Speaking and listening to nature: ethics within ecology. Biodiversity and Conservation. 9(8). 1009–1027. 11 indexed citations

8.

Cooper, Nigel. (2000). How natural is a nature reserve?: an ideological study of British nature conservation landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation. 9(8). 1131–1152. 18 indexed citations

9.

Cooper, Nigel, et al.. (1995). Ecologists and ethical judgements. Biodiversity and Conservation. 4(8). 783–785. 7 indexed citations

10.

Cooper, Nigel. (1995). Wildlife conservation in churchyards: a case-study in ethical judgements. Biodiversity and Conservation. 4(8). 916–928. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact