Niels Gaul
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Byzantine Studies and History
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Shelley Hales (1 shared paper)Lloyd Llewellyn‐Jones (1 shared paper)Vern L. Bullough (1 shared paper)Michael Grünbart (1 shared paper)Shaun Tougher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Byzantinische Zeitschrift (1 paper)ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (1 paper)Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Russia
In The Last Decade
Niels Gaul
9 papers receiving 31 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Classics 21
- Anthropology 24
- Archeology 10
- History 7
- Equine 1
Countries citing papers authored by Niels Gaul
This map shows the geographic impact of Niels Gaul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niels Gaul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niels Gaul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Niels Gaul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niels Gaul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niels Gaul. The network helps show where Niels Gaul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Niels Gaul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 2 | Networks of Learning: Perspectives on Scholars in Byzantine East and Latin West, c. 1000–1200 | 2014 | 7 |
| 3 | The twitching shroud: Collective construction of paideia in the circle of Thomas Magistros | 2007 | 5 |
| 4 | All the Emperor's Men (and His Nephews): Paideia and Networking Strategies at the Court of Andronikos II Palaiologos, 1290-1320 | 2017 | 3 |
| 5 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 7 | Writing ‘with Joyful and Leaping Soul’: Sacralizing strategies, scribal hands, and ceremonial in the Lincoln College Typikon | 2015 | 2 |
| 8 | Rising elites and institutionalization – Ēthos/mores – “debts” and drafts: Three concluding steps towards comparing networks of learning in Byzantium and the “Latin” West, c.1000–1200 | 2014 | 1 |
| 9 | Zooming in on Constantinople: Introductory notes on the interplay of center, province and periphery in the tenth-century Byzantine empire | 2018 | 1 |
| 10 | Byzanz. Historisch-kulturwissenschaftliches Handbuch | 2016 | 0 |
About Niels Gaul
Niels Gaul is a scholar working on Classics, History, Anthropology, Archeology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 10 papers that have together received 45 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (21 citations), Anthropology (24 citations), Archeology (10 citations), History (7 citations) and Equine (1 citation). Niels Gaul has collaborated with scholars based in Russia. Frequent co-authors include Shelley Hales, Lloyd Llewellyn‐Jones, Vern L. Bullough, Michael Grünbart and Shaun Tougher. Their work appears in journals such as Byzantinische Zeitschrift, ORCA Online Research @Cardiff and Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.