Nicole Gervais
- Genetics top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Albert AdamGiuseppe A. MolinaroYves LepageCharles BlaisPatricia SolomonMassimo CugnoKelly K. O’BrienMichel J. Dugas
- Topics
- Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (10 papers)Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers)Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (8 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaStroke
- Partner nations
- CanadaSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nicole Gervais
51 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Genetics 428
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 251
- Cognitive Neuroscience 189
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 169
- Clinical Psychology 159
Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Gervais
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Gervais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Gervais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Gervais more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Gervais
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Gervais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Gervais. The network helps show where Nicole Gervais may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole Gervais
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole Gervais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole Gervais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole Gervais. Nicole Gervais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 148 | |
| 20 | 107 |
About Nicole Gervais
Nicole Gervais is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Genetics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (10 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers) and Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (428 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (86 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations). Nicole Gervais has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert Adam, Giuseppe A. Molinaro, Yves Lepage, Charles Blais, Patricia Solomon, Massimo Cugno, Kelly K. O’Brien, Michel J. Dugas, Agnès Lacreuse and Philippe Raymond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.